Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's overall score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's, although it is just a little heavier and a bit thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy F62 has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 3 GB more RAM. The Galaxy F62 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F62 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.