Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a 97.6 score against 75.6. Even though Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy Fold construction is noticeably heavier but also thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both of these phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so both of them should count with very similar operating system features.
Galaxy Fold features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has just a bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more MP camera.
Galaxy Fold features a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.