Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System), so they should provide very similar OS features. Galaxy M30 is a lighter and a little thinner device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite better screen density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger aperture, a way better video definition, a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos. Galaxy M30 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.