Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's, although it is also just a bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bigger display and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor, a lot better video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.