Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even though it was released 2 years before. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 32 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.