Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 overall score. The Galaxy Note10 construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even when both were released with only a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and Galaxy Note10 both count with similar displays, and although the Galaxy Note10 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little less pixels per display inch, they both have a same size screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.