Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a 77.7 score against 75.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note3 is much older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's body is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has more cores (although slower). Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a little sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit higher pixel count in each display inch and a quite larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 192 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.