Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 has a general score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's overall score of 75.6. Even though Galaxy Note4 is extremely older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's design is lighter and a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels quantity per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 24 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.