Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy On7 Prime is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a 76.9 score against 75.6. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy On7 Prime is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features just a little better processing power than Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher pixels count per inch in the screen and a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much better video resolution.
Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the Galaxy On7 Prime also has 32 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.