Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Even when Galaxy S10 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy S10 is much lighter and just a little thinner.
The Galaxy S10 features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S10 has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.