Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a 93.6 score against 75.6. Even though the Galaxy S10 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released only 4 months apart, the Galaxy S10 5G is a bit lighter and just a little thinner. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger display and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution. Galaxy S10 5G has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.