Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's body is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although both of them were only released 4 months apart. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite have really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, a same size sensor and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.