Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S10e and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released only a couple months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10e is extremely lighter and just a little thinner. The Galaxy S10e has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount per inch in the display. The Galaxy S10e counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3100mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.