Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a 94.8 score against 75.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy S20 is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S20 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20's battery duration is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T one. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality images and videos, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with better video frame rates and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.