Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy S20 FE features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.