Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a score of 98 against 75.6. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a bit higher pixel quantity per display inch and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same aperture and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot better resolution camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.