Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a global score of 95.4 against 75.6. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it is a little thicker and heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.