Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a overall score of 76 against 75.6. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a just a little thinner but just a bit heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cores. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S24 FE also counts with a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Galaxy S24 FE features a greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S24 FE features superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.