Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 global score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a extremely thinner and lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a bit higher pixel number in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a way larger camera sensor and a lot higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy S25's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.