Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 75.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.