Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a 77.8 score against 75.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is noticeably older and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's body is still extremely lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the previous 4.4.2 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels quantity per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos, a larger aperture and a much higher resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB and 16 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.