Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's construction is extremely lighter and just a bit thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy S7 has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.