Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with an 80.1 score against 75.6. Even being the best we compare here, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is way thicker and extremely heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel count per inch in the display.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.