Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 81 score against 75.6. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro's body is thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro feature really similar displays, both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, a same size display and the same count of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 1 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.