Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having an 88.5 score against 75.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Galaxy Z Flip and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released with only 5 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip is a bit lighter and thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a just a bit greater pixels count in each inch in the screen and a bit larger display. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.