Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having an 85.6 score against 75.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, extremely thinner and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little better amount of pixels in each display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.