Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.