Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a 94.6 score against 75.6. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's, although it's notably heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 both count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.