Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a 90.6 score against 75.6. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and way thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 9 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.