Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia Z4v is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a score of 78.8 against 75.6. Sony Xperia Z4v is a way lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but both are 0.34inches thick. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Sony Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Sony Xperia Z4v has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has an additional graphics co-processor. Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a little bit better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has just a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.