Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 88.9 score against 75.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's design is thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a just a little lower pixel amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2088 x 2250px and a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a smaller aperture, a camera in the back with a way lower 48 mega pixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way tinier sensor shooting way worse quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.