Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 87.9 score against 75.6. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These devices have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has an 18% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.