Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 has a general score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 score. Apple iPhone 7 is an a lot older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's extremely lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. IPhone 7 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a much smaller display, a just a little lower pixel density and a much lower resolution of 750 x 1334.
IPhone 7 has a greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better performance than iPhone 7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery life than iPhone 7, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.