Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 global score. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an notably older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but Google made it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.