Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, having an 81.1 score against 77. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a incredibly newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
HTC U Ultra features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display. The HTC U Ultra has a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes greater videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.