Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is incredibly newer than the HTC U11's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The HTC U11 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the HTC U11 count with very similar CPUs, and although the HTC U11 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has more memory to install applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a little more than HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.