Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Mirror black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 global score. Even being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an a little heavier and a little thicker device than LG Q70. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 10 operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster processor than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG Q70 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both have incredibly similar screens, because although the LG Q70 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2310px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG Q70 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has a 26% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.