Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 81.3 score against 81.1. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.