Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's design is thinner and lighter. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.