Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's score of 81.1. The LG Velvet is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even when both were only released 0 months apart. LG Velvet has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
LG Velvet has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with a processor that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, they have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
LG Velvet not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.