Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a score of 81.1 against 80.9. These phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is extremely older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have a same size screen, the same display density and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both feature really similar batteries performance, although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a 0 percent smaller battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a much higher video resolution, a back facing camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.