Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a general score of 81.1 against 77. Despite being the best we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is much older, thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a little higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo's battery life is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery performance, although the Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just 5000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.