Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a general score of 83.4 against 81.1. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is newer, a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a better pixels number in each inch of display and a screen with the same size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a much lower 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture and a much higher video definition. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.