Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a global score of 81.9 against 81.1. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is newer, lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, providing some additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.