Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 81.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer phone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the same quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a display with the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video and a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.