Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's global score of 81.1. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have a screen with the same size, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same pixels density. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 50 mega pixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.