Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's global score of 81.1. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter.
Moto G200 5G has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a quite greater pixel density and a quite bigger display. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a way worse 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.9 aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G200 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, although the Moto G200 5G has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.