Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G60s's global score of 79.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G60s. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11 version.
Motorola Moto G60s has a display that is just as good as the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although the Motorola Moto G60s also has a bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit greater display pixels density. Moto G60s counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. Moto G60s counts with a battery life that's just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery performance, although the Moto G60s has just 5000mAh of battery size against 5020mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, they both have a same resolution camera, the same video frame rate and the same video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.