Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's score of 76.7. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Motorola Moto G9 Play were released with only a few months difference, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is a bit thinner but also just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G9 Play.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a higher pixels amount per inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Moto G9 Play's memory capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although the Motorola Moto G9 Play has a 0 percent lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.