Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is newer than Moto Z Force's, but it is somewhat thicker and way heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs more than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.